I went to a meeting last night of the Councils new General Purposes Committee. I had booked Myself in to speak on one of the items, well the only agenda item actually, under Council Procedure Rule 24.1 that allows other Members to attend and speak at Committee’s.
I set off all fired up because I had received a phone call just as I was leaving telling me that I would not be allowed to speak as this Committee was exempt. This came as a complete surprise to me as Members have always been allowed to speak, the only exception as far as I know is Licensing as that is a Quasi Judicial Committee.
Without wanting to sound too grand and full of my own importance I am a democratically elected Councillor and as such should have the absolute right to have my say on behalf of those who I am elected to represent wherever and whenever and about whatever I feel that I should.
So I arrived all fired up and full of adrenalin ready for a massive argument and quite prepared to be physically removed from the building by security if necessary only to have the wind taken from My sails when it was agreed that I would be allowed to speak. I can only assume that it was felt the subject matter on the agenda was potentially embarrassing and no-one should be allowed to criticise the proposals.
At this point I suppose I should congratulate Simon Moores for making a decent fist of his first meeting as Chair and allowing a free and true democratic debate to take place, I hope that he continues to run his meetings in the same vein in the future.
I don’t always agree with him but credit where it is due.
Basically the Committee were discussing the Council’s senior management restructuring and the resulting increase in Senior Officers salaries. I wont go into details here as the report is confidential, suffice to say that it was agreed that the proposals would be made public shortly and Cllr Moores undertook to ensure that this happened.
The only sour note is that Cabinet had already agreed last November that the Council would be bound by the Consultants report before they even knew the content or consequences of it!.
Now call me a Silly Billy but how can you agree to something in advance that you have no idea about or any idea what or where it will lead to.
Thanet Councillor Jo Gideon shortlisted for Conservative candidate for Kent Police and Crime Commissioner
-
Local councillor Jo Gideon has been shortlisted in the selection of the
Conservative candidate for the new Police and Crime Commissioner role in
Kent. Jo...
3 hours ago

6 comments:
Interesting that they agreed to be bound before knowing anything - wouldnt have anything to do with Common Purpose by any chance
Thank you for your comment Mike.
I strongly believe in proper democratic debate in the interests of proper transparency. While we held rather different positions on the matter being considered; a difficult one in the present economic circumstances, I'm certain that members of both groups valued your contribution to the discussion as I did.
Mike thanks for bring this up sounds daft but it has happened anyway it can be changed cos it is stupid. also you say "I don’t always agree with him but credit where it is due." I am glad you dont it would make for boring meetings. But dont lower yourself to the level of others who let things get to them so much they fight in the street.
I am always uncomfortable when discussing what other people's jobs are worth, particularly when it comes from the Labour side where there has always been the taint of envy and sour grapes associated with it.
From what little I know the Hay process is used to define what individual roles are worth, and it seems reasonable once committed to it that going against the process is not really just or fair to those involved.
I thought the Labour Party was all about these very two essential points. But from what I am reading this only applies to those deemed worthy by the local Labour Party apparatnik and thought police.
I spent the last three and a half years of My full time working life doing a Job Evaluation project for the Health Service. It was called Agenda for Change and we undertook a complete evaluation of all the jobs within the East Kent NHS Trust from the CE down to the person who washed up in the kitchens. You can see the process and handbook we used here. Other information on the process can be found HERE
Please take the time to read it and note how thorough and comprehensive it was and then compare that to the Councils pathetic effort that consisted of about a page and a half of A4. Members as usual were excluded from this secret squirrel exercise despite the fact that some Members have the knowledge, skills and experience to have had a valuable input into the process. Although any similar process always produces winners and losers my experience tells me that the winners are always at the top end of the tree and the losers are usually at the bottom.
Hence my scepticism.
nike air max 90
nike air max 95
nike shoes
nike air
nike air shoes
nike air max tn
nike air rift
nike shox r4
sports shoes
nike air rifts
nike air rift trainer
nike air max 360
nike shox nz
puma cat
air max trainers
mens nike air max
nike air
puma mens shoes
puma shoes
puma speed
nike shoes air max
nike shoes shox
air shoes
Lucyliu IS Lucyliu
nike shoe cart
puma future
levis jeans
nike rift shoes
cheap nike air rifts
bape shoes
cheap puma
nike rift
jeans shop
diesel jeans
Post a Comment